Frank O’Hara says to Grace Hartigan
‘I do not always know what I am feeling.’
(but in For Grace, After a Party
it will become about you)
spouting a poetry of indeterminacy
as he builds his identity,
a compulsion of artistry accusing
her of the betrayal of figuration
pure abstraction was required to
invent a self-referential language,
to find the convincing limits of the self
she asserted the definitive line
in his elegy in paint, Frank O’Hara, 1926-1966
now imagine the Abstract Expressionists
on Facebook, drunken missives
of fluid modernity existing within
the persistent lateral surveillance of decorum
gorging on sycophants sexting naked pictures
from the front facing cameras of smartphones
deKooning’s women couched in
an art of internalized misogyny
in this iDubai world of conspicuous
consumption, anything can be a commodity,
masquerade as a pretense or solipsistic dissolution
accompanied by a string orchestration
to score a cinematic self-expression
all devolves into projection and reflection
tactical apologues in the life of the mind
code-talker paradox a side effect
in a cyber-context devoid of meaning
simultaneously blocking and enabling communication
digital age where we cannot make marks
that depress the paper, only unembossed gloss
we’re so far from the sumptuous feasts
debauched scenes and willful obscurities
of Lycophron’s Alexandra, offering instead
staid symposia and motivational speeches
forgetting the orgiastic origins
and slave owning of the intelligentsia
Plato was the first literary dandy
explicating the joys of exploitation
revived by the Queen of Versailles
time share dream pushers building
90,000 square feet of opulence because they can
suing the filmmakers for life story rights
we bleat mutilated themes like Adele anthems
(registering attempts at emoting)
obsessive tracks running on elliptical trainers
to avoid over-hyped terrorist psychosis
virtualization is an act of fallacious connection
Time polls reiterate being rich will make you happy
performance art in the social hierarchy undermining
Rich’s dream of a common language
private and public merged
process and product revealed
so that the art and artist are one
unheeding the warning signs
Pollock’s unveiling killed him because
he knew the falsehood he stood upon
(cigarette butts and ejaculate
embedded in house paint)
how could we not continuously turn
to the melodic tones of dancing limbs?
pregnant looks, throwbacks to lover’s songs
ingestions of longing, You Belong to Me
melds into Make You Feel My Love
both speak intensely of possession,
of an invented and distorted humanity,
at the edge of thought as it becomes volition
or fades into the void, a gnat’s worth of life energy
in the storied American pursuit of happiness
Excellent
‘I do not always know what I am feeling.’…ha…i could’ve said this as well…so much in this anna…art and artist becoming one..i think all the things we see…even the rudimental things on fb…all is a trying to express and define ourselves….shade against light…vice versa…always moving and never satisfied…maybe
we bleat mutilated themes like Adele anthems
(registering attempts at emoting)
obsessive tracks running on elliptical trainers
to avoid over-hyped terrorist psychosis
ha. i like that stanza….the american pursuit is a packed statement itself….and what will make you really happy…not rich, i’ll tell you…at least not with money…there is a richness though well beyond that…as we let those emotions kinda muddle out…
Why does a pursuit, as in the pursuit of happiness, so often lead to going nowhere?
Anna, there is enough here to keep my monkey brain busy for a month of Sundays! Where to even start?
When the medium is democratized, does that also give everyone a message? Um, no. We live in a world of “did this / did that” status updates tossed out into the ether in hopes of collecting a few self-defining comments from others doing the exact same thing. There is no foundation to our observances and no real communication occurs so what we get is the obscene, the mediocre, and the mundane.
Amazing work, Anna.
Wow, this is a great piece. Recording perhaps? I love all of it, but this really stood out for me:
“in this iDubai world of conspicuous
consumption, anything can be a commodity,
masquerade as a pretense or solipsistic dissolution
accompanied by a string orchestration
to score a cinematic self-expression”
This is a great piece. I love the words you are using (but I might need to google a few :)) You challenge and overcharge my brain.. 🙂
Thankfully we have dVerse and don’t have to expose ourselves on facebook
shyte, I’m exhausted. Well played, Anna. You are a force to be reckon with and I’d much rather have Pollock’s deviant behavior versus the vapid, shallow, impotent attempts of entitled-me babies. Oppps. Did I say that?
Wow…just wow.
Oh my… This is a masterpiece, filled with layers of truth and portraits of life that I often choose to look away from. Art is changing, and though in some ways it makes me sad, in other ways I find it fascinating. This poem is both a mirror and a window, and something worth looking at for a long time.
wow–love imagining with you what the Abstract Expressionists would do with Facebook–
“drunken missives
of fluid modernity existing within
the persistent lateral surveillance of decorum”
and I love the way you dance through philosophy and intelligentsia’s history–so many favorite lines, the Frank O’Hara bit perhaps my most favorite:
a compulsion of artistry accusing
her of the betrayal of figuration
pure abstraction was required to
invent a self-referential language,
to find the convincing limits of the self
Those last three lines I could savor all night.
And this, YES!:
we bleat mutilated themes like Adele anthems
(registering attempts at emoting)
obsessive tracks running on elliptical trainers
to avoid over-hyped terrorist psychosis
and this one of the real problems with social media–random newsfeeds and nothing to show for it:
cyber-context devoid of meaning
simultaneously blocking and enabling communication
digital age where we cannot make marks
that depress the paper, only unembossed gloss
Oh, wow, and this. . .so true, so true–your diction here is just fabulous:
iDubai world of conspicuous
consumption, anything can be a commodity,
masquerade as a pretense or solipsistic dissolution
accompanied by a string orchestration
to score a cinematic self-expression
“Solipsistic dissolution” just about sums up current society.
Mind-blowing work, Anna.
Oh and almost forgot: “Plato was the first literary dandy” Excellent!
so then this is my favourite piece of yours because it explores all the avenues that I roam with clarity whilst retaining poetry as a backbone and mostly in concrete but with enough abstraction to Venn diagram the necessary spaces. And the AE’s on Facebook is classic. Obviously I have been reading you for years now but today felt like a first and this is a gift. See you at the Cedar AG 🙂
Quite a depiction of the social norms of the day, a whirlwind in fact. Sometimes it seem that our emotional/psychological depth has abbreviated to a short-hand existence!
Hi Anna, this felt very much like a spoken word piece of the day – I do not think the abstract expressionists would much care for facebook! I think this is a very carefully and well wrought piece but I am not sure that I agree with parts of it – I think the artist often ends up being far more driven by a kind of narcissism and also by a deep love art as much as social issues – for whatever might be said – I can’t think of Pollock as standing on falsehoods – I love Pollock – and I kind of like deKoonig a lot too, though I am pretty sure that neither was terribly enlightened about women. You write so well – I’m just not sure that the ache for possession is particularly American – maybe it’s more openly so – but seems like bourgeoisie is a French word! Oh well. I admire your passion and great skill with language and ideas – but I think so many artists especially visual ones are intensely competitive with tradition itself – they really do want to make a name for themselves – and maybe this is what you are writing about =- and certainly the two painters you mention are primary examples – but I find the newer field people like Jeff Koons – so very much worse. All interesting. k.
imagining abstract expressionists on facebook…. instagram and its many mutations comes to mind. your philosophical strength in this piece is flawless and I so enjoyed the steady purity of your voice. completely engaging and thought provoking.
digital age where we cannot make marks
that depress the paper, only unembossed gloss –
this makes me sad. I want to feel those depressions. It connects me in a tangible way to history, something a digital feed can never do.
A great piece, Anna.
To me, facebook is a soapbox and very quickly I learned that saying anything on it is a shoutout to all my friends at once. When I separate my friends out by lists do I further draw lines between them? What interesting picture does that create. Most of what I post are pictures. I love facebook mostly for that, but that’s not what a lot of folks do. Is there a sort of collective expression of sorts to be found looking at the newsfeed? Actually, imho, it is rather depressing sometimes. But it’s an interesting idea to think about how it would look like as an abstract art — what shapes or colors do these things build?
To me, it seems this poem is unsure what human connection means in the digital age/world. But a lot of things in the cyberworld are sort of dream like… unreal and naturally abstract. And I sometimes think the FB newsfeed is an echo similar to how one’s mind can be– a lot of noise, a lot of mess of unwanted input, and fragmented bits mostly unimportant. Maybe that’s just me. Maybe that’s one reason not to pay FB so much attention too. 😀
Thanks for this thought-provoking poem.