I am a compass point in an unending universe, embodied individual, imperfect processor with selection bias – they tell me there is no central intelligence, no consciousness observing, overseeing the multifaceted psyche – no woman in the Cartesian theater of the mind, no audience observing the play of my life
yet I can’t let Baar’s global workspace theory rest when asked to paint a self-portrait in words I wish to defend the existence of consciousness – to believe my thoughts, perceptions, memories, emotions, will and imagination are a concatenation, a gestalt, a self, a soul, a sentient mind, a meaning! constellation of attributes that create my relationship with the world, engaging objectivity and subjectivity, the binding problem, central enigma, hard question of consciousness (to locate the integrated coherent global response that allows me to stand at Hecate’s crossroads and choose)
fractal cascade of central nervous processes – query: do I have wave or particle nature, or both? neurons exhibiting stochastic resonance, signal to noise ratio maximization in a ‘∩’ shape plot – am I the signal, a self, a capital I subject? dynamic chaos rules under these blue eyes, star trails ink pathways beneath porcelain skin, correlation matrix maps burn into my endothelium, scar tissue reminds me of all my xenophobic visitors
don’t edit, don’t rewrite, don’t debride the wound as the error light flashes – global brain excitations, an inflated quantum system – entangled anticipation resonating future brain states, he says, ‘the anticipatory quantum chaos of the living cell has become the conscious mind . . . generations of conscious beings traversing the sentient wave-particle universe’ – but you want something more personal, more specific
I dissect and create in equal measure so here is some objective data I’ve compiled, indexed, and collated: 99.99th percentile IQ and EQ, 99th percentile achievement test results spurring an interest in the theoretical and abstract, I’m a highly conceptual complex thinker who seeks out deeper meaning and layers – exhibiting extremely high reasoning, organizational, spatial, logical, mechanical, numerical, verbal, and visual capabilities
what of ethics? under quantifiable circumstances I value empathy, equality, sacredness, engagement with natural, artistic, and moral beauty, all balanced by a high need for cognition
tested and verified personality traits compared with hundreds of millions of people/’selves’ around the world – very high: friendliness, assertiveness, activity level, altruism, sympathy, self-efficacy, dutifulness, achievement striving, self-discipline, cautiousness, artistic interests, emotionality, adventurousness, intellect, liberalism, agreeableness, conscientiousness, and openness to experience – very low: modesty (you’re shocked?), depression, self-consciousness, immoderation, vulnerability, and neuroticism (if you knew my childhood you’d see this as miraculous)
in my subjective view I embrace the objective and add generous, resilient yet fragile, prone to question, defined by and baffled by love, spiritual, flawed, an optimist in love with the world and ideas, always seeking engagement, strategic, passionate, curious, always connecting the dots whether they should be or not, limited in one state and unlimited potentiality in another, a less than stellar speller, embroiled in an inevitable process of biology
I am a ghost in the machine, an unbounded magnolia and a speck of stardust, no one yet everything I’ve got, a mythic beast and a mystic seeker, an explorer, a constitutive defensible line, an act of imagination and an embodied person, artistic filter in photoshop and the camera’s cold eye, a corpus collosum, a liberation and confinement, a querist let loose in the imaginarium
This prose poem/stream of consciousness was written for Fred at dVerse Poet’s Pub. Its alternate title: Lost in Translation. His excellent and thought provoking prompt on self-portraits shouldn’t be missed. http://dversepoets.com/2012/10/27/poetics-self-portrait/#comments
Very interesting graph – and then the poem – this is almost like a third-person analysis in a lab = really very interesting – or in the first person, as if a key had been turned – an identification (very precise and detailed given) and then the key turned back = so that it almost seems like stream of machine rather than consciousness – but of course, the words kind of belie that – but also support it – that conflict between magnolia and academic – very interesting and complex. k.
I was thinking a lot about the objective/subjective divide, the enigma of consciousness and the complementarity of wave-particle nature prompted by a paper by a mathematician/physicist. I was trying to illuminate both, objective analysis, which the mirror provides in a slightly duplicitious way and subjective experience without getting too personal since this is on the internet :). I think aspects of personality and self can be in conflict and I know this comes out in my work. Thank you for the interesting and insightful comment.
I meant to say I really liked that wave/particle line very much. It is difficult, I think to do a direct self-portrait on the internet and in context of a blog – a very good topic certainly and exercise but hard – the scylla and charybdis – forgive spelling – of overexposure and narcissism threaten on both sides. You’ve done a good job.
I absolutely agree on the difficulty and threats. Times like this I hope it is only regular readers that show up. I have recurring nightmares about complete strangers arriving for revealing posts like this one. Thanks again!
this thousand words paints a wonderful picture.
reality probably needs a thousand pictures =)
i think you are courageous, brave, wise, beautiful inside and out
we in the poet community are very lucky to have you to visit.
Janet, you are a bright light and gentle heart. I think these things of you too :D.
“a querist let loose in the imaginarium”
ha, love that last line! nice imagimatical sum. this is very well written anna, enjoyed very much
‘imagimatical sum’ is a poem in itself! Thank you.
Anna, you continuously impress me. The merger of theory, reflection and interpretation is outstanding how you combined all together, each these separations that move in and out of a puzzle until you, the author, is able to properly analyze the puzzle yourself. The opening and close are quite strong, but its the midsection here that is mind-blowing. Love that you chose prose as well, not sure how it would’ve come out otherwise, but it wouldn’t have been the same I’d guess, which would’ve been a shame, for this is masterful prose at that. Thank you for sharing this tonight at poetics.
The hardest part was the pouring out without editing, it made me realize how much editing I do at every stage of the process from concept to execution. It does feel more honest but infinitely more revealing and a bit terrifying so it is a great relief to hear that it came out so well, even without the polish. The movement in and out of the puzzle of consciousness is precisely it, the need for analysis vital, and finally, to some kind of livable conclusion. Thank you very much for the detailed feedback!
All that you are and more, faerie dust and rockymountains, limitless skies and unbounded love, music of the spheres and of the heart, words filtered through the languages of history, unique soul in an unlimited number of souls in history – no one is like you nor ever shall be. Great poem, I loved every brilliant word! There’s nobody who writes as you do.
Gay, you’ve gone and given me a melting cry, how beautifully kind you are, your acceptance and encouragement have been a guiding light over the past year. This supportive community has been so generous in letting me be myself and try new things without judgment but always offering useful feedback. Thank you so much, you’re an inspiration.
you know anna, this is so you…ha….first the graph was intimidating, lol…until started looking around it…the prose iswonderful…love all the reference material as well through out…again its so you…i agree it feels third person and very analytical…some lists, the traits…modest, smiles….you unbound magnolia you…smiles…
Thanks so much for the laugh Brian, I actually love the graph, lol. I was inspired by the prompt pointing out when an artist paints a portrait you wonder if they’re faithful to what they see of if they embellish so I got this idea of looking at the ‘facts’ I have about me (which I kid you not are in a binder, with a summary sheet, all divided by tests administered by psychologists, etc). Big smiles!
Ditto on everyone else’s remarks. This is so ‘you’ inside and out. It’s complex, subtle, gentle, kind. An enigma within a puzzle.
Ooo, ‘enigma within a puzzle’, that could be another alternate title :). Thanks so much!
oh this is gorgeous…this is so you…i was really wondering what you would write…and it made me smile big time…smiles
Hard to hide in a poem that’s supposed to be a self-portrait though trust me, I tried :). That you think it is gorgeous is sublime, thank you Claudia and for always making me feel included and welcome. I’ve never had that in a writing community, it’s worth more to me than I can express.
Phew! I’m puffed out, that was really fast, so many aspects and complex. I did love the last stanza, being that ghost in the machine always looking for answers and other questions. for a stream of consciousness it was extremely well written. Very much enjoyed!
I have only written a few stream of consciousness pieces so I really appreciate your feedback. Thanks so much for the visit!
My scientific side (I don’t have one) enjoyed the graph 🙂 I like your referral to yourself as an “embodied individual” in the first para/prose. My artistic side enjoyed your third para/prose in which you allow yourself to explore your outer-self to rain on such a descriptive portrait …. a very beautiful you in every aspect.
Haha, sorry about that. Thank you, nice to meet you.
Wow…for a small speck of stardust you have a lot to say about your place in the world…as it should be…complex, always asking questions, analytical at heart…this is lovely, Ana 😉
I always joke that my puppies don’t understand why we monkeys chatter all the time. It must seem like a racket. Thank you for your kind words :).
Each time I sit to read your work Anna, I consciously prepare myself. I sit up straighter in my chair, open a new screen to the side so I can have easy access for looking up new words, and sometimes I put my cat, Moxie, outside so she isn’t tempted to paw the keys while I read. The flow of this poem is so smooth. Your authentic voice drives it. I felt a bulging in the middle with details and information, scrumptious diction and images. As the poem closes, I find myself hoping it won’t end. This is brilliant. I thank you for pouring out this way. My senses are expanded.
That’s too funny your cat paws at the keyboard as I’m always worried one of my puppies is going to post a comment. Jane, I always deeply appreciate your feedback and attention.
The beauty of being human is the diversity in which every single being can float in. The depth of one organ, one incident, one thought and one moment in time cannot be measured or likened to the next mans. We are different, therefore we are. Thank you.
Yes, that diversity astouds and delights me, thank you. Nice to meet you!
The depth of your thought is obviously immense. I like this so much. It is so honest. What stood out for me was modesty, because you’re such a brilliant person. I’m always flattered when you comment on my blog. What comes through is a very kind and friendly person, who accepts the simplicity of those of us who don’t reach the levels of your thinking. Thank you Anna, for being you.
Thank you, Myrna. So you know I never think of you or your beautiful poetry as simple. It’s a joy to read your work.
We can expect a discourse and rightly so. The graph makes this somewhat an analysis based verse. A cursory glance tells one to be prepared to get through some educational thing. Nicely done Anna! We come away knowing something extra!
Hank
Yes, I think the graph is the warning shot across the bow for what I was attempting conceptually. Thanks Hank for this thoughtful comment.
fascinating! I am not at all surprised since this is how complex and amazing I already thought you were 🙂
(if you knew my childhood you’d see this as miraculous) – I don’t know your childhood, but I still see this as miraculous
Thank you Sheila, I think you are amazing too :)! You’ve given me warm fuzzies.
You’ve told us everything . . . and nothing. I can’t think of a more brilliant way to illustrate the subjective / objective divide. You’ve starkly illuminated the reality of individual consciousness by shining the light AWAY. Again, just freakin’ brilliant.
Mama Zen you get an A+++ from me in reading comprehension and brilliance. Thank you, you put the biggest smile on my face and a spring in my step.
I read this twice, and read all the comments as well, and first of all, what they said. But the thing I found most intriguing was how honest this was, how revealing and yet concealing it was. It is the most fascinating, though unintentional, camouflage I’ve ever seen. There is so much I’d love to talk to you about in this, but I think that would be best done in person, and with wine, so… 😉
Yes, it is such a shame we never get to meet up in a real pub. Since I never drink wine would likely make me spill the beans ;). Thank so much Patti!